Connect with us

Alternative News

Why Won’t Bill Gates Wear A Mask?

Published

on

Why Won’t Bill Gates Wear A Mask?
Photo Credit: Truth Theory

Sayer JiContributing Writer

Here’s a fact worth checking….Has Bill Gates ever worn a mask? If so, where’s the evidence? And if not, why is he telling everyone in the world they should wear one until the vaccine he is heavily invested in becomes available to test on the public?

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” – Voltaire.

Voltaire’s observation concerning the invisible influence of political power in limiting public discourse, is highly relevant to the subject of who does or doesn’t have to wear a mask today. 

In other words, if you wish to find out who rules over you, simply found out who doesn’t have to wear a mask. 

After holding off for several months, even president Trump himself finally succumbed to pressure and donned the mask on July 11th, during a visit to the Walter Reed military hospital, no doubt disappointing those who considered him fearless and free of what has become a symbol of submission to an agenda that has very little to nothing at all to do with “protecting the public from a virus.”

Some celebrity influencers, like Deepak Chopra, are not only proudly wearing masks, but tastelessly implying that not doing so could kill you or someone you love: “Wear a mask or join the company.” 

Given the near universality of mandates around the ritual of mask-wearing within what could rightly be named the Cult of Corona, isn’t it strange that there has yet not been seen a picture of Bill Gates anywhere with a mask? You know, the same man who has been telling the world they should wear one, and prepare for perpetual lockdown until the masses comply with regular COVID testing and receiving an experimental vaccine that will be ready by the end of the year, or early 2021. Why should he of all people be exempt from role-modelling to the world what he says is an effective measure against COVID-19?

In the interview clip below, Bill and Melinda Gates discuss what they say are effective measures against Covid-19. Melinda, speaking on their behalf, says: “Wear a mask. And role model wearing a mask. Every single person should be wearing a mask without exception.”

To Melinda’s credit, she has posted a picture of herself on Twitter virtue signalling her wearing of a mask, albeit the only picture of her wearing one (and never in public). But Bill’s mask is nowhere to be found. You can use an image search engine, and still nothing will appear on the internet.

The boldly conspicuous absence of Bill’s mask speaks to the duplicity and intensity of his power, as well as the many contradictions within the official narrative surrounding preventive measures against COVID-19, some of which can be found on our Facemask database which contains published research on their lack of safety and ineffectiveness that is given no attention within the mainstream media.

Another example of this egregiously hypocritical stance among powerful elite, is the Queen of England’s recent maskless jaunt outside her castle walls — a move criticized by the media. The 94-year old is within the age group with the highest risk category, yet the DailyMail reported, “The 94-year-old shunned a mask, with Buckingham Palace confirming it was a matter of choice, rather than due to any health reason.”

Given the draconian crackdown of the Queen’s government and its lack of honouring exemptions for the general public who are not given the choice she exercises, her behavior speaks to the nature of those who “rule over you,” namely, do what I say and not what I do, is the rule of thumb.

Wouldn’t the Queen and Bill Gates carry more gravitas and credibility with the public if they actually did what they say is the right and reasonable thing, instead of simply acting the stereotypal part of unelected rulers?  If you can find that image of Bill, please let us know. Thanks!

Recommended Articles by Sayer Ji
About the Author

Sayer Ji is the founder of Greenmedinfo.com, a reviewer at the International Journal of Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine, Co-founder and CEO of Systome Biomed, Vice Chairman of the Board of the National Health Federation, and Steering Committee Member of the Global Non-GMO Foundation.

For more, visit GreenMedInfo.com and Facebook.com/GreenMedInfo, or sign-up for GreenMedInfo’s free e-Newsletter.

© March 12th, 2018 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for their newsletter here.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Alternative News

Edward Snowden On Big Tech Companies, Like Facebook, Censoring & Controlling Information

Published

on

Edward Snowden On Big Tech Companies, Like Facebook, Censoring & Controlling Information
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

Glenn Greenwald is no stranger to censorship, he’s the journalist who worked with Edward Snowden (NSA mass surveillance whistleblower) to put together his story and release it to the world while working for the Guardian. He eventually left the Guardian and co-founded his own media company, The Intercept, an organization that would be free from censorship and free to report on government corruption and wrong-doings of powerful people and corporations. He recently resigned from The Intercept as well due to the fact that they’ve now censored him, and is now completely independent. You can find his work here.

Anybody who reports on or sheds a bright light onto immoral and unethical actions taken by governments and the powerful corporations they work with has been subjected to extreme censorship. In the case of Edward Snowden, he’s been exiled, and Julian Assange of Wikileaks is currently clinging to his life for exposing war crimes and other unethical actions by multiple governments and corporations. There are many other examples. What does it say about our civilization when we prosecute those who expose harm, corruption, immoral/unethical actions by governments and war crimes?

Greenwald recently interviewed Snowden about internet censorship and the role big tech companies and governments are playing. Greenwald explains that in one of his earliest meetings with Snowden, he (Snowden) explained that he was driven in large part by the vital role the early internet played in his life, “one that was free of corporate and state control, that permitted anonymity and exploration free of monitoring, and, most of all, fostered unrestrained communication and dissemination of information by and among citizens of the world without corporate and state overlords regulating and controlling what they were saying.

This is what he and Snowden go into in the interview posted below. Prior to that I provide a brief summary of Snowden’s key thoughts.

Snowden starts off by mentioning government surveillance programs and the companies they contracted to do this work and compares them to modern day Big Tech giants censoring information on a wide range of topics. We see this today with elections/politics, to medical information dealing with coronavirus and vaccines, for example.

“In secret, these companies had all agreed to work with the U.S. Government far beyond what the law required of them, and that’s what we’re seeing with this new censorship push is really a new direction in the same dynamic. These companies are not obligated by the law to do almost any of what they’re actually doing but they’re going above and beyond, to, in many cases, to increase the depth of their relationship (with the government) and the government’s willingness to avoid trying to regulate them in the context of their desired activities, which is ultimately to dominate the conversation and information space of global society in different ways…They’re trying to make you change your behaviour… – Snowden

So basically, these Big Tech companies have become slaves, if you will, to the governments will, or at least powerful people situated in high places within the government. Snowden brings up the fact that many of these companies are hiring people from the CIA, who come from the Pentagon, who come from the NSA, who have top secret clearances…The government is a customer of all the major cloud service providers. They are also a major regulator of these companies, which gives these companies the incentive to do whatever they want.

This is quite clear if you look at Facebook, Google and Amazon employees. There are many who have come from very high positions within the Department of Defence.

In no case is this clearer than Amazon – Snowden

Amazon appointed Keith Alexander, director of the NSA under Barack Obama.

He was one of the senior architects of the mass surveillance program that courts have repeatedly now declared to be unlawful and unconstitutional….When you have this kind of incentive from a private industry to maintain the warmest possible relationship with the people in government, who not just buy from you but also have the possibility to end your business or change the way you do business…You now see this kind of soft corruption that happens in a constant way. – Snowden

Snowden goes on to explain how people get upset when government, especially the Trump government, tries to set the boundaries of what appropriate speech is by attempting to stop big tech censorship, he then says,

If you’re not comfortable letting the government determine the boundaries of appropriate political speech, why are you begging Mark Zuckerberg to do it?

I think the reality here is…it’s not really about freedom of speech, and it’s not really about protecting people from harm…I think what you see is the internet has become the de facto means of mass communication. That represents influence which represents power, and what we see is we see a whole number of different tribes basically squabbling to try to gain control over this instrument of power.

What we see is an increasing tendency to silence journalists who say things that are in the minority.

You can watch the full conversation between Greenwald and Snowden below, the conversation is about 40 minutes long.

Closing Comments: This kind of information almost begs the question, are we ready as a society to truly create and disseminate journalism that is honest, integral and bi-partisan? Why is it that these types of organizations fail or struggle? How do some media companies fail? Well, they no longer stay true to their mission. They fall to the pressure of politics and fall into ideology. How many other times did ideology change what media outlets reported? Yes, it’s almost impossible to have zero bias, but how close can we get to zero? How can we achieve this when media outlets that do not fit within the accepted framework and disseminate information that challenges the popular opinion are constantly being punished for simply putting out information?

As Snowden mentioned above, these Big Tech companies in collusion with governments are literally attempting to not only censor information, but change the behaviour of people as well, especially journalists. When you take away one’s business or livelihood as a result of non-compliance, you are in a way forcing them to comply and do/say things you the way you want them done/said. We’ve experienced massive amounts of censorship and demonetization, but we haven’t changed as a results of it.

…..

The Very Book The Government Does Not Want You To Read Just Went #1 In The World
You can click on the below link if you want to head over to Amazon and get a copy of it.

This article (Edward Snowden On Big Tech Companies, Like Facebook, Censoring & Controlling Information) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

COVID-19 Has A 99.95% Survival Rate For People Under 70 – Stanford Professor Of Medicine

Published

on

COVID-19 Has A 99.95% Survival Rate For People Under 70 – Stanford Professor of Medicine
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

What Happened: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, from the Stanford University School of Medicine in California recently appeared on a JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) Network conversation alongside Mark Lipsitch, DPhil and Dr. Howard Bauchner, who interviews leading researchers and thinkers in health care about their JAMA articles.

During the conversation, Dr. Bhattacharya said that the survival rate from COVID-19, based on approximately 50 studies which has been published providing seroprevalence data, for people over 70 years of age is 95%. For people under the age of 70, the survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.95%. He went on to state that the flu is more dangerous than COVID-19 for children, and that we’ve (America) had more flu deaths in children this year than COVID deaths.

Obviously, his comments are open to interpretation and similar comments floating around the internet have been refuted by Facebook ‘fact-checkers.

Bhattacharya has cited this study, published in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization to come to his conclusion, along with, as mentioned above, many more.

These facts and many others are what inspired Bhattacharya, along with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist, and Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology to create The Great Barrington Declaration.

The declaration strongly opposes lockdown measures that are being and have been put in place by various governments around the globe. The declaration has an impressive list of co-signers from renowned doctors and professors in the field from around the world, and now has nearly 50,000 signatures from doctors and scientists. The declaration also has approximately 660,000 signatures from concerned citizens.

The Declaration states,

The Declaration was written from a global public health and humanitarian perspective, with special concerns about how the current COVID-19 strategies are forcing our children, the working class and the poor to carry the heaviest burden.  The response to the pandemic in many countries around the world, focused on lockdowns, contact tracing and isolation, imposes enormous unnecessary health costs on people. In the long run, it will lead to higher COVID and non-COVID mortality than the focused protection plan we call for in the Declaration.

The declaration also states that as herd immunity builds, the risk of infection to all, including the most vulnerable, falls. Bhattacharya has explained that he and his colleagues don’t see herd immunity as a strategy but as a simple “biological fact,” adding, “It will eventually happen. That’s how epidemics end. So, the only question is how you get there with the least amount of human misery, death, and harm.” The best way, he said, is to “acknowledge who actually is in danger and devote enormous creativity, resources, and energy to protect them.”

The Declaration recommends implementing measures that protect the vulnerable without locking down the entire population, shutting down businesses and limiting people’s access to health-care.

Stefan Baral, an infectious disease epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, said he supported adaptive interventions to protect at-risk people rather than broad lockdowns of entire populations. He said his mother lives in Sweden and “there’s nowhere else I would have wanted my mom to be. I love my mom and I feel she’s safe there.”

A report published in the British Medical Journal  titled Covid-19: “Staggering number” of extra deaths in community is not explained by covid-19″  has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the months of April and May. According to the data, Covid-19 only accounts for 10,000 of the 30,000 excess deaths that have been recorded in senior care facilities during the height of the pandemic. The article suggests and also quotes British Health officials stating that these unexplained deaths may have occurred because Quarantine measures have prevented seniors from accessing the health care that they need.

Bhattacharya has also cited an estimate from the United Nations World Food Program indicating that pandemic lockdowns causing breaks in the food chain are expected to push 135 million people into severe hunger and starvation by the end of this year.

These are just a few many examples and concerns the declaration is referring to.

Another perspective on these survival rates? According to Professor Robyn Lucas, head of the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health at the Australian National University,

Survival rates and the percentage of the population who have not died are two very different numbers, “They are using the whole population, rather than the number who have diagnosed infection. So this is not really ‘survival’ – to survive a disease you have to have the disease in the first place,” Prof Lucas told AAP FactCheck in an email. (source)

Why This Is Important: Never before have we seen so many renowned doctors, scientists, and experts in the field oppose the recommendations and actions taken by the World Health Organization and multiple governments to combat a health crises. The fact that there is a great divide among the scientific and medical community makes one ponder how governments can have the mandatory authority to lockdown our planet when there isn’t really a scientific consensus to do so.

What’s also quite concerning is the fact that big tech companies, like Facebook, have been actively censoring and flagging information and opinions that oppose those of the WHO and government health authorities. Unpopular opinions and recommendations aren’t really given any attention by mainstream media either and they’re often ridiculed by them. The Great Barrington Declaration is a great example.

Because of all the discrepancy, it wouldn’t be a bad idea for governments to simply present the science and make strong recommendations and leave the citizenry to do what they’d like to do. To each his own, that’s just my opinion. I believe we are more than capable enough, and intelligent enough to determine the right course of action for ourselves. A lot of people have lost trust in their government and this is because actions taken by them have simply called into question whether or not they make decisions with humanities best interests at heart.

Are they really executing the will of the people?

When it comes to COVID-19, we’ve seen that this may not be the case. Kamran Abbas is a doctor, executive editor of the British Medical Journal, and the editor of the Bulletin of the World Health Organization. He has published an article about COVID-19, the suppression of science and the politicization of medicine in the British Medical Journal.

It it, he states the following:

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health. Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

When we allow governments and give them the power to use force when so many people disagree with their recommendations, it makes one question just how much power do these entities have? And why? Why do we choose to be governed in such a way? Why aren’t we free to make our own decisions?

More important than facts is our ability to get along with one another and see from the perspective of another. We must understand why those who disagree with us feel the way they do, and they must try to understand us. Constantly arguing and disagreeing with each other and always being in a state of constant separation don’t solve anything. Now more than ever we need to respect one another and try see from a perspective that’s not our own. Can’t we find some middle ground and all get along? It’s ok to ask questions and challenge our governments, in fact, it should be encouraged.

Some Further Reading, If You’re Curious…

This article (COVID-19 Has A 99.95% Survival Rate For People Under 70 – Stanford Professor of Medicine) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

5D Shift: Essential Evidence Of A Widespread Awakening Underway

Published

on

Photo Credit: Pexels

OpenGuest Writer

Society is currently terraforming through the 4th Industrial Revolution, driven by two juxtaposed energies in the field: the progressive Ascension of Human Consciousness, and the shadowstate efforting – hook and nail – to lock it down. The Plandemonium is all about taking greater control of people’s lives and particularly financially, which is the next wave of control to come. Meanwhile the blockchainers are opening doorways of expansion and freedom not seen since the early days of the internet. Mass adoption of cryptocurrency is here, which is a powerful tool to weaken the long arm of the shadowstate. To me, overall, the dynamic signals a widespread awakening is underway…

Rebellion Against Dominion

It may look like the shadowstate is winning this war on human consciousness. But that’s only if you read the mainstream media, which by now, to anyone whose even partially awake, must have lost all credibility. The final nail in the coffin must be the Presidential Election. Whichever political party you may have supported, it’s clear, there are literally thousands of reported cases of alleged voting fraud applied in a widespread systematic way, using irregular postal ballots and questionable computer software.

The main point here is the staggering afront to democracy – how the mainstream media have called the election result BEFORE it’s decided and trying to steamroller any objection. It’s shocking. Anyone who truly values freedom of thought, speech, movement and governance must seriously question the next time they pick up a mainstream newspaper or visit a mainstream media website. It’s time we make them irrelevant by using them less – much less!

Meanwhile, the 4th Industrial Revolution rolls on (for which the election has been a key linch pin). The shadowstate in the guise of the Plandemonium is reshaping lives in the most fundamental of ways – how the masses live, work and travel. And essentially, where we might get our resources from. It’s all being done without our consultation and consent. However, it will NOT all go their way. Far from it. Plenty of people ARE turning away from the duplicitous state media. They are NOT believing the plandemonium propaganda. They are NOT taking the coolade. Waves of rebellion are growing around the world, especially in Europe. Plenty are taking back personal sovereignty and under the Common Law, challenging the authority of bogus state legislation.

Check out this Openhand Lead Article on Reclaiming Your Sovereign Rights Under Common Law

Birth of the Blockchainers

The next battle has already begun and on a different front – this time financial. Shortly after the credit crunch of 2008, a mysterious “White Hat” called Satoshi Nakamoto developed Bitcoin, sitting on a distributed ledger system called the Blockchain. Bitcoin was originally used by society’s misfits and mavericks as a digital means of payment – with freedom across borders outside of the central banking system. As the banksters continually inflate their “helicopter” fiat money, thus progressively devaluing it, Bitcoin’s code limits to a total of 21 million coins, and thus has become a true store of value – what many are calling the new digital gold.

Meanwhile a raft of other cryptocurrencies sitting on the blockchain have sprung up and indeed plenty of new ones with each passing day. To be clear, this is NOT just about digital money. They are more sophisticated and DECENTRALISED ways of connecting with people on an immediately updating system of proof. Imagine for example, in light of what has just happened, a truly honest vote leading to government that is genuinely of the people – I see a revolution on the horizon where the billionaires manipulating the main stream media to get elected are relegated to the back seats. The veils will fall when people realise that together, they have enormous power. Especially with decentralised systems like the Blockchain.

Right now, we are on the cusp of a wave of mass adoption of cryptocurrency. I wonder how many out there are seeing the enormous significance of this. Certainly the shadowstate and the central bankers who are scrabbling to catch up. They’re literally falling over themselves to create new Central Bank Digital Currencies (CDBCs), which to be clear, will be very different indeed from true cryptocurrency. How so? The 4th Industrial Revolution is the shadowstates answer to the mass awakening of human consciousness – lock down people into a synthetic high tech reality, dumbed down by mass induced DNA subjugation, through continual rounds of vaccine. Block out the light of the soul and people become readily programmable. I believe the next part of the plan is to allow the old banking system to wither and perish under the humungous debt mountain, and then bail people out with a CDBC issued directly to your phone app, but crucially, with all manner of prying eyes and strings attached. Like the digital health passport for example. Big brother meets Big nanny!

The Role of Cryptocurrency in the Unravelling 5D Ascension Shift

Rise of the Misfits and Mavericks

For every person that dares to venture into the world of crypto on the blockchain, there is an escape from this control, an expression of freedom and increased financial independence – a shaft of light through the darkness. I fore warn you though, it’s quite a minefield out there to navigate in these early days. First if you’re to venture into true cryptocurrency you’ll need to understand how your wallet keys to the blockchain work, and how to carefully send via encrypted addresses. New services are emerging daily that make it more easy without the need to fully understand the technology. Paypal for example has just started selling 4 types of crypto to its millions of American customers (and set to be rolled out around the world), which has rocketed hugely in just the first two weeks. To be clear, this is NOT the true essence of crypto – you don’t own the private keys and you can’t take it from their system. Nevertheless, in buying and storing it, there is a means by which to benefit from its escalating value.

Please Note: there is a strong upward trend for crypto heading into and through 2021. However, anyone who’s been in the development since the early days will tell you, that although the progressive trend is upwards, crypto is very volatile. Plus since the technology is new, some coins will succeed and others fail. Bitcoin itself, for example, will become very exposed and vulnerable to quantum computing some way down the line, whereas later generation cryptos such as ethereum can possibly thrive much better.

What’s abundantly clear is that the early stages of widespread adoption of cryptocurrency is here, is now. And crucially, it’s AHEAD of widespread adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies. This is highly significant. For those looking out into the world and seeing the darkness of the lockdowns, it’s clear to me at least, that this mass crypto adoption is signalling a widespread dawning of consciousness: I believe it demonstrates willingness towards personal sovereignty in the form of a higher degree of financial freedom.

Moving into a New 3D/5D Hybrid State

I do understand plenty will not have reserve funds to invest in crypto at this current time. No worries. Each will have their pathway forwards through this terraforming shift. Some will go off grid entirely; others will blend with the system as ghosts in the machine. CDBCs can still be used. But just as mobile phones and internet browsers allow in the prying big brother eye, we’ll need to be careful how we use them, and ideally not owned by the system in how we live and work.

We’re going to need to be increasingly light of foot in this terraforming society. We’ll need to be flexible, innovative and readily open to change, which in itself, is the very nature of the soul. These will be the very wings to keep us aloft as we move into a new 3D/5D hybrid state.

Discover how to become an Independent Spiritual Facilitator in the Shift

5D Shift of Consciousness – Shafts of Light Breaking Through

Let’s beware the doomers and gloomers out there – including those in the spiritual mainstream who’ve gotten too attached to the surface drama. It’s not all dark! The light is breaking through in the energy field underneath and churning up the swamp – which to me, the widespread adoption of cryptocurrency indicates. This is happening at the same time as growing waves of people around the world are challenging the pandemic narrative.

I do believe the controllers are beginning to lose control.

Of course the mainstream media will sureptitiously try to program you otherwise. Don’t let it. Feel into the energy field and trust in its movement. We are far from out of the woods yet, but shafts of light are shining through. One of them is shining your own path forwards for you. Realise the truth of your soul. Let it illuminate and inform each step forwards.

These are vibrant and exciting times to be alive. As I expected right at the beginning of all this, the plandemonium by the shadowstate would backfire and instead catalyse a widespread awakening. I can feel the early signs of this like the sparks of a fire, growing and taking a hold. The next great shift of consciousness for humanity is towards sovereignty of soul. It’s expressed in every single step and choice we make. Right now, a growing wave is voting for that freedom and independence of expression. To me, widespread adoption of Blockchain technology, and uprisings against lockdown, indicate a revolution in consciousness is upon us.

Take Back Your Sovereignty and Freedom with Openhand’s: 5D Ascension Program

Namaste, Open 

Originally published at www.openhandweb.org and reproduced here with permission.

Recommended Articles by Open
About the Author

Openhand is a unique approach to spiritual evolution: integrating enlightened wisdom of spiritual masters through the ages, it is a way of tapping into the Benevolent Guiding Consciousness of the Universe and aligning with it in your life. It helps you unveil your True Self, remove karmic blockages and unfold your Divine Destiny. It leads to authentic, resilient and truly successful living.

Join us… Openhandweb • Openhand Facebook • Openhand TV

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Merck Claiming HPV Gardasil Vaccine Caused Debilitating Injury

Published

on

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Merck Claiming HPV Gardasil Vaccine Caused Debilitating Injury
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

What Happened: Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, a law firm based in the United States, along with attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr recently filed their fourth lawsuit against Merck on behalf of Sahara Walker. Walker is a 19 year old girl from Wisconsin who suffered debilitating injuries from the Gardasil HPV vaccine.

Two days after she took the vaccine, she starting vomiting and experiencing headaches, sever body aces, extreme fatigue that had her bed ridden where she remained, unless she used a wheelchair.

Over time Sarah’s symptoms became more severe. In 2015 her medication schedule rose to 55 pills a day while she endured 54 doctor appointments. She was eventually diagnosed with neurocardiogenic syncope, postural postural orthostatic tachycardia (POTS), a form of orthostatic intolerance called orthostatic hypotension, small fibre neuropathy and severe autoimmune autonomic neuropathy.

An article written by Kennedy explains,

Today, Sahara, 19, takes 14 prescription medications and receives an expensive intravenous immunoglobulin treatment every three weeks.

“I want to warn kids of the terrible risks for this vaccine and let other injured girls know that they are not alone,” Sahara explained. “The Gardasil vaccine stole my life. Before Gardasil, my future was filled with endless possibilities. Now, my life is a parade of accommodations and medical interventions. It’s not how a 19 year old should live. I’m fighting for all of us.”

If Merck had warned Sahara’s mother about Gardasil’s dangers, she never would have allowed her daughter to receive the HPV vaccine.

“We are pro-vaccine, but we would have never had Sahara get Gardasil if we knew the risks,” Sahara’s mother said. “She went from perfectly healthy to sick and disabled within days of the shot. It’s beyond any doubt that Gardasil caused her injuries.”

Internal documents showed that Merck cherry-picked its own data to mislead the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and doctors about Gardasil’s safety and efficacy. We aim to get justice for Sahara and others impacted and to force Merck to stop defrauding the public so that we can protect our children.

If Merck had warned Sahara’s mother about Gardasil’s dangers, she never would have allowed her daughter to receive the HPV vaccine.

“We are pro-vaccine, but we would have never had Sahara get Gardasil if we knew the risks,” Sahara’s mother said. “She went from perfectly healthy to sick and disabled within days of the shot. It’s beyond any doubt that Gardasil caused her injuries.”

Internal documents showed that Merck cherry-picked its own data to mislead the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and doctors about Gardasil’s safety and efficacy. We aim to get justice for Sahara and others impacted and to force Merck to stop defrauding the public so that we can protect our children.

Why This Is Important: Deaths and permanent disabilities have been reported as a result of the HPV vaccine all across the globe for many years.

For example, researchers from Mexico’s National Institute of Cardiology pored over 28 studies published through January 2017—16 randomized trials and 12 post-marketing case series—pertaining to the three human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines currently on the market globally. In their July 2017 peer-reviewed report, the authors, Manuel Martínez-Lavin and Luis Amezcua-Guerra, uncovered evidence of numerous adverse events, including life-threatening injuries, permanent disabilities, hospitalizations and deaths, reported after vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent Cervarix vaccine and Merck’s quadrivalent or nine-valent HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Gardasil 9)

Japan stopped recommending the HPV vaccine as a result of serious adverse reactions. Multiple films have documented this phenomenon, we’ve written about one of them before called Sacrificial Virgins.

There are a number of documented examples from all over the world, and they are full of debate between the manufacturer and the person injured with regards to whether or not the vaccine actually played any role in the injuries and deaths. For example, a 14-year-old boy named Christopher Bunch passed away more than a year ago, and the mother and father are claiming that it was as a result of the HPV vaccine. His mother started a petition over a year ago claiming that her son “died as a direct result of the HPV vaccine.”

On January 26th, the father of the boy, Elijah Eugene Mendoza-Bunch, wrote this via his Facebook page,

So back on December 11th 2019 I sent an email to CEO Ken Frazier of Merck song to speak with him about the HPV VACCINE and how it killed my son and how it is destroying lives. Well here we are January 25th (the day I got it in the mail) and this is the response from Merck….

You can view their response and read more about that story here.

These are just a few of many examples.

Science Calling the Vaccine Into Question: A new study published in The Royal Society of Medicine is one of multiple studies over the years that has emerged questioning the efficacy of the HPV vaccine. The researchers conducted an appraisal of published phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer and their analysis showed “the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy” in the data they used. The researchers emphasized that “it is still uncertain whether human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents cervical cancer as trials were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop.”  The researchers point out that the trials used to test the vaccine may have “overestimated” the efficacy of the vaccine.

A study published in 2013 in Current P. Design carried out a review of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure trials to assess the evidence of their effectiveness and safety. They found that,

HPV vaccine clinical trials design, and data interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes, were largely inadequate. Additionally, we note evidence of selective reporting of results from clinical trials (i.e., exclusion of vaccine efficacy figures related to study subgroups in which efficacy might be lower or even negative from peer-reviewed publications). Given this, the widespread optimism regarding HPV vaccines long-term benefits appears to rest on a number of unproven assumptions (or such which are at odds with factual evidence) and significant misinterpretation of available data.

For example, the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70% reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death), nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based extrapolations are justified. Likewise, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities).

We thus conclude that further reduction of cervical cancers might be best achieved by optimizing cervical screening (which carries no such risks) and targeting other factors of the disease rather than by the reliance on vaccines with questionable efficacy and safety profiles.

Vaccine ingredients have also come under a lot of scrutiny over the years, especially aluminum, and the HPV vaccine contains aluminum.

“There has not been any clinical trials designed and carried out to test the safety of aluminum adjuvants. Not a single clinical safety trial for any vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant.” – Professor Christopher Exley, Professor of Bioinorganic Chemistry and group leader of the Bioinorganic Chemistry Laboratory at Keele University.

It’s concerning that aluminum hasn’t been tested for safety.  Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of Initiative For Vaccine Research at the World Health Organization mentioned at a WHO vaccine conference at the end of 2019, that there are clinical studies that blame adjuvants for adverse events seen as a result of administering vaccines, and how people in general often blame adverse reactions to vaccines being the result of the vaccine adjuvant. You can find a link to that conference and read more about it here.

Professor Christopher Shaw from the University of British Columbia in Canada explains that injected aluminum doesn’t come into the same methods of excretion as the aluminum we take in from food, for example. When we inject aluminum, it stays in the body, it may cross the blood brain barrier, enter into cells and various organs in the body.

When you inject aluminum, it goes into a different compartment of your body. It doesn’t come into that same mechanism of excretion. So, and of course it can’t because that’s the whole idea of aluminum adjuvants, aluminum adjuvants are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over and over again persistently, otherwise you wouldn’t put an adjuvant in in the first place. It can’t be inert, because if it were inert it couldn’t do the things it does. It can’t be excreted because again it couldn’t provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system. – Dr. Christopher Shaw – Canadian neuroscientist and professor of ophthalmology at the University of British Columbia (source)

In 2018, Shaw published a paper in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry that found almost 100% of the intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants was absorbed into the systemic circulation and travelled to different sites in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen where it accumulated and was retained for years post-vaccination. (source)

Exley and a team of scientists published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

The publication goes on to address concerns it has with another paper that was published a year prior, emphasizing that the authors of that specific publication, JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros,

The Takeaway

Did you know that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury (NCVIA) Act has paid out nearly $4 billion dollars to families of vaccine injured children? This is not money coming from the Big Pharma company. The NCVIA insures that these payments come from taxpayers, the Big Pharma companies are not held liable. Vaccines are a liability free product.

Why is any type of information that paints vaccines in a ‘negative’ light completely unacknowledged in the mainstream? Does the information in the article alone not warrant some sort of discussion, or at least some sort of acknowledgement as to why some people are concerned?

Why does mainstream media always use terms lie “anti-vax conspiracy theorist” and ridicule? More important than facts and who is right or wrong is our ability to communicate with each other without consequences. We must learn to see the perspective of those who disagree with us, and understand and feel why they feel the way they do. This needs to be our focus, if we can’t get along with people who disagree with us, we are never going to move forward and this applies to everyone.

I would argue that there is more than enough information out there regarding vaccinations that support the idea of informed consent instead of mandatory measures.

This article (Another Lawsuit Filed Against Merck Claiming HPV Gardasil Vaccine Caused Debilitating Injury) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Now

STAY AWARE

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

You have Successfully Subscribed!