Connect with us

Alternative News

Social Media Giants Remove Viral Video Of Doctors Talking About Coronavirus, Masks & Treatment

Published

on

Social Media Giants Remove Viral Video of Doctors Talking About Coronavirus, Masks & Treatment

What Happened: A video circling around the internet about a group of doctors giving a press conference in the United States talking about the coronavirus and sharing their professional opinion has been deleted by social media platforms, and virtually wiped off the face of the internet. In the video, the doctors were promoting Hydroxychloroquine as a treatment/cure for COVID-19, suggesting that masks weren’t necessary, and implying that a vaccine may not be either.

This has obviously been listed as ‘fake’ information by fact checkers.

Other doctors have raised concerns whether or not the vaccine will be more dangerous than the actual virus, like the Physicians for Informed Consent. They published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that story and access the research here.

John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate is close to 0% for people under the age of 45 years old. You can read more about that here. Obviously, if the rate grows for older age groups and immunocompromised people, just like most other respiratory viruses.

The point is, what many doctors and scientists have been telling us for months is contradicting what we are getting from big media, and the World Health Organization.

The video was then tweeted by Donald Trump Jr, which brought even more attention to it. Twitter ordered the president’s son to delete the tweet, and said it would limit some account functionality on his account for 12 hours. Donald Trump apparently shared PARTS the video as well, according to multiple media outlets like CNN.

CNN and other mainstream media outlets have called into question the validity of the video, and whether or not these are actual doctors or simply a group of people who are spreading misinformation. This is confusing, given the fact that they clearly introduce themselves, and their backgrounds can be verified. All of them. Furthermore, Congressman Ralph Norman was the first speaker, which is also not mentioned by mainstream media articles. Why would a congressman gather with a bunch of fake doctors?

The second person to speak is Dr. Simone Gold. Gold,  an emergency medicine specialist (one of multiple in attendance at the conference) based in Los Angeles started to make noise when she said there were thousands of stories of patient harm due to stay at home orders as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. This corroborates with information that’s coming from all over the world. For example,  an article published in the British Medical Journal  has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus. You can access that article and read more about it here.

In fact, Gold is the organizer of a letter signed by more than 600 doctors who pushed President Trump to end what they called a national shutdown. The letter described widespread state orders keeping businesses closed and children home from school as a mass casualty incident with “Exponentially growing health consequences.” That was back in May.

Based on our research, there have been thousands of doctors who have been heavily censored and ridiculed, while a completely different narrative gets beamed out by mainstream media at the same time. Who has the power to orchestrate such things? They are literally controlling the minds of the masses via perception manipulation through censorship and ridicule.

How come there is a digital authoritarian Orwellian fact-checker going around the internet censoring the research, opinions and discussions of prominent doctors and scientists? One of the latest to make noise doing so was Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, who criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus. He said that “the level of stupidity going on here is amazing.”

You can read more about that here.

Why This Is Important: It’s important because it goes to show that mainstream media uses nothing but ridicule, combined with their social media ‘partners’ in a massive censorship campaign to try and control the perception of the masses. They also used labels, and judgement.

We’ve seen this for decades. A document states that the CIA task force “now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,” and that “this has helped us turn some ‘intelligence failure’ stories into ‘intelligence success” stories,’ and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.” Furthermore, it explains how the agency has “persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods.”

National security has now become a term used to justify the concealment of information, as well as the brainwashing of the masses with misinformation for ulterior motives.

As far as labels and judgement goes,  CNN writes:

A video featuring a group of doctors making false and dubious claims related to the coronavirus was removed by Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube after going viral online Monday.

First of all, are the claims actually “dubious” and “false?” Do people who read CNN articles actually go down the rabbit hole to see if they are dubious and false, or do they simply believe this statement? They don’t really address all of the information about Hydroxychloroquine. The number of doctors around the world who were seeing success with this treatment was quite eye-opening, and there are a number of interesting publications about it as well but again, all we receive from mainstream media is ridicule.

This isn’t only the case with Hydroxychloroquine, but for other substances as well. It was also suspicious why studies began surfacing that the drug is dangerous after all of the studies over the years that have been conducted showed that it’s quite safe. It’s already been used for a number of years, well before the coronavirus.

The CIA document linked above not only illustrates a close relationship with media, but academia as well. Could that have something to do with it? Do the ones who are doing the censoring and ridiculing also have scientists on the payroll? What kind of control do they have over our federal health regulatory agencies? Are the publications that say this drug is harmful more convincing than the ones that show the complete opposite?

Even according to scientists from within our Federal Health Regulatory agencies, there is a big problem.

We’ve seen this type of environment with tobacco, DDT, asbestos and more. Can they really be trusted?

We’ve also seen the same ridicule factor with Vitamin C. I recently put out an article about a study published in “frontiers in immuology” strongly suggest the combined administration of Vitamin C & Quercetin for Covid-19 patients. That article goes a lot deeper, you can read it here and access the study.

The point is, once doubt is casted on something via mainstream media, the validity of it seems to be destroyed, even if it is indeed 100% valid. Mainstream media is painting in false and incomplete reality and only telling you what suits their owners interests.

When it comes to the new coronavirus, we’ve heard it time and time again. Nothing will work, nothing can work, there is no point trying to find anything else because the only thing that will and can work is a vaccine. This was the sentiment of Bill Gates early on during the pandemic, that things won’t go back to normal ‘until a vaccine has arrived,’ and still is.

The doctors explained their reasoning, and provided their information and evidence based on experience. Again, we must ask ourselves, why is this information being completely wiped from social media platforms? What is going on here?

The Takeaway

We are living in a time where information is being censored like mad. A lot of people out there have formed an opinion without really looking into the mater, and instead simply rely on and trust what their government is telling them. It can be difficult for some to accept the fact that those who make major decisions on our planet with regards to not only our health, but virtually everything, really don’t have our best interests at heart. This is the process of awakening, it’s something we have to go through and come out on the other side with a new understand, from a place of peace, not fear. An understanding that we can change the human experience any time we want to. We don’t need to continue to uphold a system that’s full of lies, deceit and corruption. It seems every single day, month and year there are more and more opportunities to wake up, see, and starting questioning what’s really going on here. That’s exactly the process we are going through now. What 9/11 did for human consciousness, COVID-19 is doing the same.

This article (Social Media Giants Remove Viral Video of Doctors Talking About Coronavirus, Masks & Treatment) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Alternative News

Alan Dershowitz Implicated In Unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell Documents

Published

on

Alan Dershowitz Implicated In Unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell Documents
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

What Happened: Well known attorney and political commentator Alan Dershowitz has been implicated in the latest news pertaining to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. She is currently being held in New York awaiting her trial next year. Dershowitz was mentioned, along with Bill Clinton and others in a set of unsealed documents that were part of now-settled civil litigation against Maxwell. She appealed the decision of the judge to unseal them, but to no avail.

Maxwell was Epstein’s right hand person, and the documents, along with testimony from many others over the past few years, show that Maxwell sexually abused children and also directed victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre to be sexually abused by others, using her and many others as sex slaves.

The NY Post explains:

The emeritus Harvard Law professor was accused of having sex with then-minor “Jane Doe #3” — identified in court documents as Virginia Roberts Giuffre — and witnessing Jeffrey Epstein and others sexually abusing girls and young women.

The allegations, lodged in a 2014 court filing, reemerged in more than 600 pages unsealed Thursday night in Giuffre’s 2015 defamation case against.

In 1997, Dershowitz wrote the following: “Reasonable People Can Disagree Over Whether It Should Be As Low As 14.” You can find that article and read more about that here.

He is currently denying the allegations made by Giuffre, calling her a liar. He also stands by that article he wrote in 1997.

Why This Is Important: Elite level trafficking and pedophilia are coming to light, and it’s a major step for humanity given that many implicated and accused people are those in positions of great power, and in some cases made out to be idolized by the general public, usually showered with fame and fortune.

Research indicates there are many children suffering and that do suffer as a result of this activity, and there are so many examples going beyond the Jeffrey Epstein showing that this is quite rampant among our political and financial elite, and among those who pull the strings that we never really see.

This type of activity also shines light onto the world of politics. For example, with regards to Epstein and Maxwell, there is evidence suggesting that both are actually high ranking intelligence officers, with the job of entrapping powerful politicians and people. You can read more about that here. Is this what goes on in the system we continue to hold up and empower by voting year after year? Why are we playing with a system that’s clearly created out of disconnection and separation, and that does not allow humanity to thrive?

Is it time for something new? Is the current state of our world a reflection of the ‘leadership’ we choose and agree to put into power?

If you want to see some more examples and dive through more evidence, you can refer to this article I published towards the end of last year.

You can also watch our interview with a survivor of these types of pedophile rings.

You can access the full interview and start your free trial here.

The interview is with Anneke Lucas, who is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model. Her work is based on personal experience of a 30-year healing journey after surviving being sold by her family as a child sex slave to a pedophile network.

The interview is deep, and goes into the consciousness aspect of her experience and why that aspect is so important.

The Takeaway: There are many events taking place that are causing people to really question what’s happening on our planet and why. Why do we think and live the way we are living, and why is there so much misinformation, deception, and examples of fraud and deceit that come from multiple governments? Is it really a surprise that many of these people may be involved in activities that represent such a disregard for human life? Isn’t that what geopolitics has resulted in? War is a great example.

More people are starting to realize that we’re not really living in a democracy, but in the illusion of democracy where our physical rights are slowly taken away by governments who are capitalizing on crisis after crisis, ones in which they themselves help create and prolong.  Elite level child trafficking simply shines a light on how our current level of unconsciousness is creating a world built on disconnection.  Now is a time where these truths are being made transparent.

At the end of the day, we can change things anytime we want. We are indeed that powerful as one human collective.

This article (Alan Dershowitz Implicated In Unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell Documents) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

US Government & Yale Hold Clinical Trials On How Best To ‘Persuade’ Americans To Take COVID-19 Vaccine

Published

on

US Government & Yale Hold Clinical Trials On How Best to ‘Persuade’ Americans to Take COVID-19 Vaccine
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

What Happened: The US Federal government in collaboration with Yale University are held clinical trials to determine what the best messaging would be to persuade Americans to take the COVID-19 vaccine when it is ready. The news of this study does show an interest in finding the best way to emotionally and mentally manipulate people into an ideal decision for the Federal government, and likely vaccine makers, and it also shows that a mandatory vaccine campaign may still be the plan B down the road, as opposed to plan A.

According to the brief summary for the study:

This study tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available. Participants are randomized to 1 of 12 arms, with one control arm and one baseline arm. We will compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available between the 10 intervention arms to the 2 control arms.

Study participants are recruited online by Lucid, which matches census based sampling in online recruitment.

The study essentially looks at the best possible messaging that can be used on Americans, ranging from expressing vaccine benefits, to using messaging about economic impact, making someone feel guilty or embarrassed for not taking the vaccine, and so on.

The study looked at around 4000 participants aged 18 years and up, all of whom had to be US residents of course.

The various ‘arms’ used in the study when it came to messaging were as follows:

Other: Control message
Other: Baseline message
Other: Personal freedom message
Other: Economic freedom message
Other: Self-interest message
Other: Community interest message
Other: Economic benefit message
Other: Guilt message
Other: Embarrassment message
Other: Anger message
Other: Trust in science message
Other: Not bravery message

Interestingly, the study also looked at various social elements involved in vaccination, see below:

Primary Outcome Measures:

  1. Intention to get COVID-19 vaccine [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]…This is a self-reported measure, immediately after the intervention message, of the likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccination within 3 months and then 6 months of it becoming available. During analysis, responses among those assigned to different intervention messages will be compared to those in the control group.

Secondary Outcome Measures:

  1. Vaccine confidence scale [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]…This is a validated scale. This scale will be used to assess the impact of the messages on vaccine confidence. (Outcome assessed only for the half of the sample that answers these items post-treatment)
  2. Persuade others item [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]…This is a measure of a willingness to persuade others to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
  3. Fear of those who have not been vaccinated [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]…This is a measure of a comfort with an unvaccinated individual visiting an elderly friend after a vaccine becomes available
  4. Social judgment of those who do not vaccinate [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]…This is a scale composed of 4 items measuring the trustworthiness, selfishness, likeableness, and competence of those who choose not to get vaccinated after a vaccine becomes available.

Why This Matters: As more credible information about vaccinations and their associated dangers circles the internet and informs people, their choice to not vaccinate in certain situations is increasing. As noted by The World Health Organization, even doctors are starting to question and have a lack of trust in vaccines due to adverse reactions. Because of all of this, Big Pharma now have to work harder to convince people to get vaccines so their profits can stay where they are at. We are seeing the power of free and open media. You can likely guess you would not see a story like this nor honest coverage about vaccines in mainstream media.

The Takeaway: Humanity is waking up to truths that have long been held hidden behind the lack of honest media and government. As we begin to understand what is truly going on behind the scenes, we are beginning to ask even deeper questions. Why have we not be told the full story? Why do we give up our power to those who do not have our best interests at heart? What role are they playing in the awakening of humanity? Who are we? Why are we truly here and why are we not thriving as a global society? What is truly holding us back?

These questions lead us inwards to explore the true nature of who we are. Do we really lack the solutions in our world to allow humanity to thrive? Or is it that human consciousness is suppressed and stuck in a story of separation? Raising human consciousness is the solution we’re looking for.

This article (US Government & Yale Hold Clinical Trials On How Best to ‘Persuade’ Americans to Take COVID-19 Vaccine) was originally created for Collective Evolution and is published here under Creative Commons.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Records Of Prince Andrew’s Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police

Authorities have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager.

Published

on

Records Of Prince Andrew’s Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
Photo Credit: Collective Evolution

(TMU) – According to a former member of the Royal guard who worked on Prince Andrew’s security detail, The London Metropolitan Police have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager that was being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The night in question is March 10th, 2011, as well as the morning hours of March 11. Virginia Giuffre, who was known by the name Virginia Roberts at the time, says that she was taken to London by Epstein and Maxwell and was expected to have sex with Prince Andrew.

Giuffre says that she was just 17-years-old at the time and remembers being taken to the “Tramp” nightclub in London, as well as one of Maxwell’s homes in the city.

Andrew was questioned about Giuffre’s accusations during an interview with BBC, and he made numerous mistakes and fumbles that brought his credibility into question.

In the interview, Andrew vehemently denied knowing Giuffre and insisted that he was not at that nightclub on March 10th.

He claimed that he was at a Pizza Express location in Woking, for a party, but at least one other witness has come forward to corroborate Giuffre’s claim. The witness says that she distinctly remembers seeing the prince at the nightclub on that evening.

There should be records of what the prince was doing on that evening, which would either exonerate him or prove that he was lying. Members of the royal family are regularly accompanied by police guards in their day to day activities and there are records of where and when the officers were sent, or at the very least a record of which officers worked on which day.

If these records were to be made available, the investigators could easily determine where Prince Andrew was on the night in question. Initially, police refused to release this information to the media, insisting that revealing such sensitive information about the royal family could be a “threat to national security.”

One of the guards who was assigned to work Andrew’s security detail on that night, remembers having an issue with the prince when he returned to Buckingham Palace.

He says that Andrew ended up making his return to the palace very late that night, but wanted to obtain the records to confirm that this was the same night.

A few months ago, the former guard requested to see his shift records from his time working Andrew’s security detail. He got no response for months, but was eventually contacted by a caseworker with the London Metropolitan Police.

The caseworker told him that the records were destroyed, and said that it is the agency’s policy to only keep records for two years, which is a bit of a strange policy in the computer age where files don’t take up much space.

“I am very disappointed. Why on earth did it take nearly five months to respond with such a non-informative answer? I’m also surprised to discover that any records regarding the Royal family and their police protection are destroyed, much less after just two years,” the guard told the Daily Mail.Formun Üstü

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Unsealed Maxwell Docs Reveal Testimony Of Bill Clinton With “Two Young Girls” On Epstein’s Island

A set of documents were unsealed from a previous civil trial between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.

Published

on

Bill Clinton Went to Jeffrey Epstein's Island With 2 'Young Girls', Virginia Giuffre Says
Photo Credit: TMU

(TMU) – Last night, a set of documents were unsealed from a previous civil trial between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, one of the most public and outspoken of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.

After Giuffre went public with her accusations in 2010, she faced a storm of very public denials and attacks from Epstein’s associates which lasted for years.

As a result, Giuffre filed defamation lawsuits against those who attacked her in the media. A lawsuit against Maxwell was settled in June of 2017, but everything that was revealed during the trial was sealed, aside from the fact that Maxwell was forced to pay Giuffre millions of dollars in the settlement.

Maxwell’s attorneys have fought to keep the details of the civil trial sealed, but their requests were denied by a judge who ordered the documents to be unsealed this Thursday.

Among the information revealed in the documents, is Giuffre’s testimony that she saw former Democratic President Bill Clinton on Epstein’s island with “two young girls” from New York.

In her testimony, Guiffre said that she remembered Epstein telling her that Bill Clinton owed him some favours.

“He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here [on Epstein’s island] kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me favors. He never told me what favours they were. I never knew. I didn’t know if he was serious. It was just a joke… He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favours. They’re all in each other’s pockets,” she said in her testimony, according to Newsweek.

It is well-documented that Clinton was closely connected with both Epstein and Maxwell, and spent a significant amount of time on Epstein’s island.

He also continued to hang out with them after they were both exposed as sex offenders. In fact, Maxwell was served court papers relating to the Epstein trafficking ring in 2009 while she was attending the Clinton Global Initiative at the Sheraton Hotel in New York City.

Just a few months later, Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, and Bill continued his relationship with both of them for many years despite the public knowledge of their crimes.

After Epstein was arrested last year, The Clinton Foundation was forced to respond to the allegations that the former president was a participant in Epstein’s trafficking network.

The foundation claimed that Clinton “knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to,” and suggested that “Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane.

“Staff, supporters of the Foundation, and his Secret Service detail travelled on every trip. He’s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and has never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida,” the statement read.

However, according to flight logs that were leaked in 2015, Clinton has taken at least 11 flights on Epstein’s airplane. Clinton is just one of many high profile individuals who are suspected of being involved in Epstein’s trafficking network. Other names include Prince Andrew and President Donald Trump.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending Now

STAY AWARE

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

You have Successfully Subscribed!